Subject	Front tires were great, rears about 30% tread.
Posted by	Speedy1003 (IN) on June 09, 2005 at 1:03 PM
	This message has been viewed 29 times.
In Reply To	why was he replacing tires anyway???????? posted by 2ZXtreme on June 09, 2005 at 08:29 AM
Message	I explained all of this to the buyer and he understood the tire condition and was fine with it. That is where this get's really strange. The tire condition of all four was very much good enough to run this whole summer before needing replaced. He didn't offer all of the info, but he made it sound like he was replacing the rubber on all four, which was totally not necessary. This point alone makes me wonder if he did something to the rims prior to bringing the wheels to his tire guy. I am working towards closing this deal up as we speak. The feedback here has helped out very much.
Follow Ups	Calling all fair businessmen > opinions on a deal gone bad - Speedy1003 (IN) 18:36:28 06/08/05 Were they insured? (n/m) - zboost 18:42:37 06/08/05 does he have pics of bent wheels? - dogpile 18:43:19 06/08/05 No refund IMHO - my car can beat up your car 18:43:25 06/08/05 he could have just gotten around to mounting them - dogpile 18:45:40 06/08/05 True, but usually dont you or wouldnt you think - my car can beat up your car 18:52:52 06/08/05 exactly - myzislow 19:06:25 06/08/05 no doubt. missed the part boot not opening it - dogpile 19:41:20 06/08/05 Has he been driving on them for the full 30 days? - SactoTodd 18:46:14 06/08/05 too long... - ZSDADDY 19:08:32 06/08/05 Re: Calling all fair businessmen > opinions on a deal gone bad - ybnormal70 19:19:20 06/08/05 Amtrak Express --- WooT!!!! (n/m) - Speedy1003 (IN) 20:00:33 06/08/05 Only the sender can file a damage claim. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 00:19:25 06/09/05 with Amtrak or any sender? - zgene4 00:25:52 06/09/05 the sender has to relinquish right of claim to the recipient (n/m) - Guapo 00:31:11 06/09/05 BS. He installed them, abused them, and got upset. - just4kinks 19:23:45 06/08/05 One: Can you tell for sure they were not bent - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 19:32:09 06/08/05 30 days without opening the box?!?! - mattztt 19:38:00 06/08/05 To answer a few questions... - Speedy1003 (IN) 19:55:02 06/08/05 Not all tire machines created equal - Noncon 20:09:57 06/08/05 Good article. Thanks. (n/m) - WayneLaR 20:55:51 06/08/05 Well I know you are a trustworthy seller - Mickleson(OH) 20:35:04 06/08/05 IMO, too much time has passed. (n/m) - dpjax 20:38:14 06/08/05 Well, I'm the master of not opening boxes right away... - Only1Z 20:43:51 06/08/05 30 days is "reasonable time" ... no refund - SuparexTT 22:14:12 06/08/05 30 days, too long. - zgene4 23:54:11 06/08/05 why was he replacing tires anyway???????? - 2ZXtreme 08:29:37 06/09/05 Front tires were great, rears about 30% tread. - Speedy1003 (IN) 13:03:39 06/09/05 Good luck... - 2ZXtreme 16:06:53 06/09/05 if you told us the truth i thinkg the buyer bent the rims. (n/m) - E=mz² 09:02:09 06/09/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.